Context Navigation

#2757 closed enhancement (done)

Provide friction test datasets as regression problem instances

Reported by:	gkronber	Owned by:	gkronber
Priority:	medium	Milestone:	HeuristicLab 3.3.15
Component:	Problems.DataAnalysis	Version:	3.3.14
Keywords:		Cc:

Description (last modified by gkronber)

As used for following publications:

G. Kronberger, M. Kommenda, E. Lughofer, S. Saminger-Platz, A. Promberger, F. Nickel, S. Winkler, M. Affenzeller - Robust Generalized Fuzzy Modeling and Enhanced Symbolic Regression for Modeling Tribological Systems, submitted to Applied Soft Computing, 2017
E. Lughofer, G. Kronberger, M. Kommenda, S. Saminger-Platz, A. Promberger, F. Nickel, S. M. Winkler, M. Affenzeller - Robust Fuzzy Modeling and Symbolic Regression for Establishing Accurate and Interpretable Prediction Models in Supervising Tribological Systems - Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence, Porto, Portugal, 2016, pp. 51-63

Change History (15)

comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by gkronber

Owner set to gkronber
Status changed from new to accepted

comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by gkronber

r14789: added first dataset (CF1)

comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by gkronber

Description modified (diff)

comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by gkronber

r14790: added problem instance descriptors for miba friction datasets

Last edited 8 years ago by gkronber (previous) (diff)

comment:5 Changed 8 years ago by gkronber

r14791: fixed training / test partitions and allowed input variables

comment:6 Changed 8 years ago by gkronber

Owner changed from gkronber to mkommend
Status changed from accepted to reviewing

comment:7 Changed 8 years ago by gkronber

r14853: set factor variables as allowed for miba friction benchmark problem instances

comment:8 follow-up: ↓ 9 Changed 7 years ago by mkommend

Owner changed from mkommend to gkronber
Status changed from reviewing to assigned

Reviewed MibaFriction regression instances.

The only comment I have is that the code in the InstanceProvider.GetDataDescriptors does not make sense to me. Why is the zip file queried and then the data descriptor matched with the filename and if that succeeds the resourcename set? When i am adding a new DataDescriptor I know the corresponding resource name and can set it directly in the class. I only have to check if the resource name is present in the archive.

comment:9 in reply to: ↑ 8 Changed 7 years ago by gkronber

Replying to mkommend:

The only comment I have is that the code in the InstanceProvider.GetDataDescriptors does not make sense to me. Why is the zip file queried and then the data descriptor matched with the filename and if that succeeds the resourcename set? When i am adding a new DataDescriptor I know the corresponding resource name and can set it directly in the class. I only have to check if the resource name is present in the archive.

Code stems from RegressionRealWorldInstanceProvider.cs. Will check.