Changes between Version 217 and Version 218 of ReviewHeuristicLab3.3.0Application

Timestamp:

04/26/10 18:12:55 (15 years ago)

Author:

swinkler

Comment:

Moved plugin manager related comments as gkronber is working on it.

ReviewHeuristicLab3.3.0Application

@@ -111 +111 @@
 === Priority: MEDIUM ===
    
- * In the Plugin Manager I do not see how I can activate disabled plugins.
- * In the Plugin Manager I do not see how I can update only those plugins that are selected.
  * There is no way to see the optimal solution that is found by the algorithm, for example the best tour or the best knapsack selection. Even though not all users might be interested to see these best results, it might help to increase the confidence of users.
  * IMHO the standard selection operators in gender specific selection should be flipped; this would more reflect behavior in nature. The reason for this is that these selectors do not specify how fe/male individuals select their parnters, but rather how they are selected.
@@ -118 +116 @@
 
 === Priority: LOW ===
+ * In the Plugin Manager I do not see how I can activate disabled plugins.
+ * In the Plugin Manager I do not see how I can update only those plugins that are selected.
  * Could it be reasonable to display a special icon for parameters that are not yet set properly (e.g., with a red exclamation mark etc.)?
    * swagner: This will be quite hard as it is not easy to decide programmatically, if a parameter is properly set or not. But we can think about it. Maybe we can introduce constrained parameters? Although it will be a lot of work to enable users to define constraints of parameters in the GUI (for example when adding a new parameter to a `CombinedOperator`).