Changes between Initial Version and Version 2 of Ticket #2624
- Timestamp:
- 10/14/16 11:31:34 (8 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #2624 – Description
initial v2 1 1 Related to #2609. Where it was observed that "I'm surprised that it is necessary to check the case of only one sub-tree for multiplications. Does the simplifier really produce these cases? It would be trivial to remove the multiplication node in such cases." 2 3 Probably it's time to completely refactor the simplifier. Potentially helpful resources: 4 * http://www-math.uni-paderborn.de/~stefanw/Papers/mathPAD_Vol11_art07.pdf 5 * http://stackoverflow.com/a/7542438