Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #2572, comment 4
- Timestamp:
- 03/07/16 15:25:16 (8 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #2572, comment 4
v1 v2 1 1 Review comments: 2 2 * What is the point of this ticket (hard to judge without a description)? It is hard for other analyzers to read the R² values, because they would have to know the solution names, because these are used as variable names. 3 4 It is currently not possible to track test R² (or other metrics for test quality) of symbolic regression solutions with the analyzers in HeuristicLab.Analysis because this value is not stored in the scope. 5 6 AFAIK, this was the reason why this analyzer was implemented originally. The analyzer also creates a chart of training and test R². This can also be achieved using the standard analyzers when the test quality values are stored in the scope. 7 8 3 * Why are there always null checks before accessing parameters? Aren't these obsolete, because the parameter is never null?
